Di Balik Fleksibilitas: Eksplorasi Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Mahasiswa Pekerja di Universitas Ngurah Rai
Abstract
The transformation of higher education in the digital era has shifted learning paradigms toward more flexible, adaptive, and work-integrated systems. This shift is evident in the growing number of working students, including those at Ngurah Rai University, who simultaneously navigate academic and professional responsibilities. However, the flexibility offered by institutions does not always align with the quality of learning experiences perceived by students, creating significant challenges in fostering student satisfaction and loyalty. This study aims to critically explore the relationship between satisfaction and loyalty among working students at Ngurah Rai University within the context of flexible higher education, while identifying key strategic factors influencing both constructs.This research adopts a qualitative approach using a systematic literature review (SLR) method, analyzing recent national and international scholarly publications over the past five years (2020–2025). Data were analyzed through thematic analysis to identify patterns, relationships, and research gaps relevant to the characteristics of working students. The findings reveal that working student satisfaction at Ngurah Rai University is a multidimensional construct influenced by learning flexibility, the quality of academic and administrative services, curriculum relevance to labor market demands, and the quality of academic interaction. Learning flexibility emerges as a dominant factor; however, its effectiveness depends on interactive pedagogical design and meaningful student engagement. Furthermore, satisfaction significantly influences student loyalty, which is reflected in long-term commitment, emotional attachment, and positive word-of-mouth intentions. Nevertheless, this relationship is dynamic and mediated by perceived value and overall learning experience. The study also identifies a gap between the implementation of flexible learning systems and the actual needs of working students. Therefore, Ngurah Rai University is required to undertake not only structural but also pedagogical transformation through the adoption of more adaptive, contextual, and experience-based student-centered learningapproaches. This study contributes theoretically to higher education management literature and offers practical implications for institutions in designing sustainable strategies to enhance working student satisfaction and loyalty.
Downloads
References
[2] Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency Remote Teaching in Higher Education: Mapping the First Global Online Semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1–24, December 2020.
[3] Tran, T. T., Nguyen, T. H., & Phan, H. T. (2021). Working While Studying: The Impact of Employment on Student Academic Performance. Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 456–470, June 2021.
[4] Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Sharman, S. (2021). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement in Online Higher Education Learning Environments. The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 50, pp. 100–110, July 2021.
[5] Kahu, E. R., Picton, C., & Nelson, K. (2021). Pathways to Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of the First-Year Student Experience. Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 1100–1115, August 2021.
[6] Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2021). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in Online Learning. Online Learning Journal, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 77–95, June 2021.
[7] Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Seebaluck, A. K. (2021). Measuring Service Quality in Higher Education: Development of a Hierarchical Model. Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1–20, January 2021.
[8] Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2020). The Influence of University Image on Student Behaviour. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 456–470, March 2020.
[9] Rojas-Méndez, J. I., Vasquez-Parraga, A. Z., Kara, A., & Cerda-Urrutia, A. (2020). Determinants of Student Loyalty in Higher Education. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 115, pp. 93–102, July 2020.
[10] Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2021). Does Higher Education Service Quality Affect Student Satisfaction, Image and Loyalty? Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 127–143, April 2021.
[11] Pedro, E., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2022). Back to Campus: The Role of Perceived Value in Student Satisfaction and Loyalty. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 351–365, February 2022.
[12] Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2020). Older, Online and First: Recommendations for Retention and Success of Mature-Age Students. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 231–257, July 2020.
[13] Kitchenham, B., et al. (2020). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–57, 2020.
[14] Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2021). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage Publications, pp. 1–336, 2021.
[15] Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, Vol. 372, p. n71, March 2021.
[16] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications, pp. 1–376, 2021.
[17] Flick, U. (2020). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, pp. 1–736, 2020.
[18] James, R., French, S., & Kelly, P. (2022). Understanding Student Diversity in Higher Education: Working Students Perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 567–582, July 2022.
[19] Larsen, M. R., et al. (2021). Experiential Learning in Higher Education: Bridging Theory and Practice. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 1450–1465, October 2021.
[20] Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2022). Suspending Classes Without Stopping Learning: China’s Education Emergency Management Policy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 1–16, February 2022.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






_uk501.png)

.2022-2026_uk200_pxl_.jpg)















.png)
3.png)
